[ad_1]
summary
-
Many World War II movies blend fiction and fact, but changing real historical figures can create unpleasant misunderstandings.
-
Inaccuracies in iconic films such as “Bridge” and “Defiance” have drawn criticism from experts and historians.
-
U-571 and Pearl Harbor have faced backlash for fabricating historical events and plagiarizing stories, drawing accusations of inaccuracy.
As an event that characterized the 20th century, Second World War [Since1945ithasbeenthesubjectofhundredsofimportantandinfluentialfilmsManyofthesefilmshavebeenpraisedforrecreatingtheviolenceandbrutalityoftheconflictwhileothershavebeencriticizedforinterpretinghistoricalfactstooliberallyManyofthemajorWorldWarIIfilmshavebeencriticizedbyhistoricalexpertsandcriticsforfailingtoaccuratelydepictvariousaspectsoftheconflictbothonthebattlefieldandbeyond[1945年以降、数百もの重要かつ影響力のある映画の題材となってきた。こうした映画の多くは紛争の暴力と残忍さを再現したとして賞賛されているが、その他の映画は史実を自由に解釈しすぎているとして批判されている。第二次世界大戦の主要な映画の多くは、戦場やそれ以外の紛争のさまざまな側面を正確に表現できていないとして、歴史専門家や批評家から批判を受けてきました。
It’s not unusual for World War II films to tell completely fictionalized stories set within the context of the conflict while remaining true to reality. private ryanFor example, it’s a prime example of a film that blends fact and fiction of what happened during the D-Day landings to create a realistic war film. Problems often arise when movies base their stories on real historical figures. In such cases, changing the narrative can be interpreted not only as a misrepresentation of history, but also as outright offensive. So it’s no surprise that the most inaccurate World War II movies garner heartfelt criticism.
Ten Defiance (2008)
The embellished story of the Bielski partisans
Directed by Edward Zwick, starring Daniel Craig. rebellion This is a retelling of the true story of the Bielski brothers. In real life, the Bielski family was a group of four Jewish Belarusians who set up a commune in the woods to escape the German army and the Holocaust, and conducted paramilitary operations such as sabotage and raids. In some respects, the film was quite accurate, especially as it related to the hardships of life in the Naliboki Forest. but, Some Polish historians criticized the film.Airbrush some unpleasant episodes from the story” (via times and guardian newspapers), including atrocities against Poles.
9 Bridge over the River Kwai (1957)
Alec Guinness’s iconic role sparks controversy
Despite the film’s status as a genre classic, bridge over the river kwai It has been criticized from many directions. On the other hand, the conditions faced by the POWs involved in building the titular bridge have been heavily sanitized for the big screen, giving an inaccurate representation of the hardships they faced. moreover, Alec Guinness’ role as Colonel Nicholson was labeled as an offensive parody of the real Lieutenant Colonel Philip Toosey, never actively cooperated with Japanese prisoners of war. This view is particularly supported by the writings of Julie Summers. Colonel Tamarkan.

Top 10 World War II epics, ranked
World War II is a popular event in movies, and for good reason. The movies that came out of it are some of the best epics today.
8 Windtalkers (2002)
Nic Cage’s controversial direction was never real
It tells the true story of the Navajo Code Talkers. wind talker It received mixed critical reaction upon release. Although the film’s fight scenes were well staged, the decision to center the story on a white protagonist played by Nic Cage was particularly controversial.But far away The film’s biggest historical faux pas was that it accused Navajo bodyguards of being instructed to shoot Code Talkers. This is to prevent them from falling into Japanese hands. According to the U.S. Naval Research Institute, “This is in no way a standing order and is definitely illegal. ”
7 Battle of the Bulge (1965)
Inaccurate depiction of war forces president to retire
While many movies garner quiet condemnation, few garner the ire of a former commander-in-chief. And yet, this is exactly what happened. battle of the bulge. Despite claiming to depict the actual events of the infamous battle; The film made multiple changes to the battle schedule, personnel, weather, and many other important details.. This not only gave rise to the modern era; new york times Critic Bosley Crowther labeled the film “attackBut it also forced former President and General Dwight Eisenhower to hold a press conference condemning it (Robert Niemi, History of media, film and television).
6 Enemy at the Gate (2001)
Sensational dramatization of real historical figures
Both though enemy at the gateThe two main characters, Vasili Zaitsev and Major König, were real. The 2001 thriller heavily fictionalizes many aspects of the Battle of Stalingrad. A key issue is that the prominent appearance of sniper warfare has been greatly exaggerated, as has the effectiveness of snipers in deterring German attacks. but, The biggest problem many historians had was with the film’s suggestion that the Red Army sent unarmed soldiers into battle.. Historian Alexei Isaev says (via) Russia Beyond), “There were no unarmed soldiers sent to attack…What is depicted in “The Enemy at the Gates” is complete nonsense.”

Veterans Day: 16 of the best World War II movies
In honor of all those who served, here’s a little something to commemorate the day from a movie lover’s perspective.
Five U-571 (2000)
Submarine thriller ruins ‘special relationship’
In the early 2000s, nothing happened between Britain and the United States, but Matthew McConaughey’s U-boat thriller U-571 It proved that the love between the two countries is not unconditional. The film tells the story of an American team sent to capture a German U-boat with the purpose of recovering an Enigma device used by the Nazis to transmit coded communications. The film rightly highlights the importance of recovering the machine and its impact on the war.
The problem with this movie is that no such American mission ever took place. in fact, The British first recovered the Enigma machine in 1941 — seven months before America entered the war.. like that, U-571 Rightly accused of plagiarizing British stories and labeled by then Prime Minister Tony Blair asinsulting the memory of British sailors who lost their lives in this action” (via BBC News).
Four Darkest Hour (2017)
Churchill biopic degenerates into propaganda
While there are many aspects, darkest hour The film received praise, including a central performance from star Gary Oldman, but received critical acclaim from historians for both its reimagining of Churchill and its failure to include important context. It also attracted criticism. Scenes such as Churchill’s fictional journey on the London Underground drew ridicule, but The strongest criticism focused on the film’s trivialization of the Labor Party’s role in standing up to Hitler.. As Adrian Smith, Emeritus Professor of Modern History at the University of Southampton, I published this article. new politician:
“(The film) once again overlooks the important role of the Labor Party at the most dangerous moment in this country’s history…In May 1940, leaders were forced to do what Churchill needed when he refused to surrender. Neglecting Attlee’s important role is just one of the failures in a deeply flawed film. ”
3 Red Tails (2012)
George Lucas plays history fast and loose
In typical George Lucas style, red tail Unraveling the story of black pilots fighting in World War II is a ferocious thrill ride. As Lucas himself stated, the film was designed to shed much-needed light on the heroism of the Tuskegee Airmen. It’s certainly thrilling, but The film has drawn criticism for both embellishing real events and changing historical figures..The movie’s claim that the Tuskegee Airmen never lost their bombers is not only false, many people have stressed red tailsthe trivialization of prejudice faced by the troops; As Adolph Reed, professor of political science at the University of Pennsylvania, puts it (via non-site):
“[The film]trivializes racism within the military by reducing it to a problem of bad attitude or outdated attitudes. The ironic effect is that the obstacles Tuskegee Airmen faced and their actual Both accomplishments are grossly undervalued by being presented as a blackface slap in the face.” ~Remake Together~ top gun.”
2:44

8 World War II movies with obvious historical errors
From biopics to fictional stories, many World War II films have ignored historical accuracy in favor of providing big-scale cinematic thrills.
2 Imitation Game (2014)
Cumberbatch’s acclaimed performance marred by inaccuracies
In many ways, imitation game Movies are a great example of how movies are an ideal medium for telling lesser-known but critically important stories. Unlike other World War II films that focus on combat, Morten Teidlum’s film revolves around the code-breaking at Bletchley Park that ultimately helped win the war. Many aspects of the film have been praised, including Benedict Cumberbatch’s performance as Alan Turing. However, the film caused great controversy, particularly in its portrayal of Turing’s character.
The film was controversial from the start, as there were rumors that the film was intended to downplay Turing’s homosexuality, and a subplot was also devised in which Turing was blackmailed by Soviet spies. Many found the suggestion that Turing would have become a traitor in an act of self-preservation insulting.. As historian Alex von Tanselmann puts it (via guardian), “...Creative license is one thing, but defaming the reputation of a great man is quite another to embrace the nasty 1950s prejudice that homosexuals automatically constitute a national security risk. It means.”
1 Pearl Harbor (2001)
Michael Bay’s sensational historical reenactment
It is widely known as one of the least accurate World War II movies ever made. Pearl Harbor riddled with historical mistakes. Over the years, critics have taken aim at everything from the fictional love story that takes center stage to the entire Dolittle Raid section. In a contemporary interview with san francisco gate chronicleHistorians Harry Gailey and Bruce Reynolds have derided moments such as President Roosevelt’s pre-attack scenes and the film’s assertion that Japan could have invaded the United States.completely artificial” and “Pure fantasy” Each. Pearl Harbor It may be great, but it’s also very inaccurate Second World War movie.
source: guardian, times, Colonel Tamarkan, History of media, film and television, Russia Beyond, BBC News, new politician, non-site, san francisco gate chronicle
[ad_2]
Source link