[ad_1]
Business Insider CEO Barbara Penn said in a memo released Sunday morning that there was no personal bias or religious motivation that influenced the report. The company announced last week that it would review its reporting process after Mr. Ackman criticized the website’s reporting.
“The process we followed to report, edit and review the article was appropriate, including its timing,” Penn wrote, later adding, “The article was accurate and the facts were well documented.” he added.
“Business Insider supports and empowers journalists to share newsworthy, fact-based stories with our readers. And we do it with editorial independence. ” she wrote. “We stand behind our newsrooms and our reporting, and that will continue.”
A spokesperson for Mr. Ackman declined to comment. Ackman himself criticized Business Insider and Axel Springer in multiple social media posts Sunday afternoon.
“Business Insider and @axelspringer’s responsibilities will only increase,” he said. I have written. “This is what they think is fair, sound, accurate and well-documented reporting in a timely manner. Unbelievable.”
On January 5, Business Insider published two cases alleging that former MIT professor Neri Oxman plagiarized some of her work, including obtaining information from Wikipedia articles to write papers. An article was published. The article reported that her husband, hedge fund manager Ackman, had resigned from Harvard’s then-president Claudine over concerns that she had mishandled student protests and committed plagiarism during her career.・The announcement was made after Gay was forced to be fired. Gay resigned as president on January 2nd.
Ackman was highly critical of Business Insider over the allegations against his wife, challenging the reporters and accusing them of unethical journalism. in a social media post On January 7, Mr. Ackman said that Business Insider’s investigative editor was anti-Zionist and targeted Mr. Oxman because she is Israeli.
Axel Springer responded to Mr. Ackman’s criticism by saying last week that it would conduct an internal investigation to determine what happened before Oxman’s article was published.
“While the facts of the report are not in dispute, the past few days have raised questions about the motives and process that led to the report, and we take these questions very seriously,” the company said in a statement at the time. said. .
Although there were concerns about the coverage, oxman apologized on X (formerly Twitter) for not using quotation marks properly. However, she stated that she properly cited all sources within her own work.
[ad_2]
Source link
