[ad_1]
Dai, J., Chen, B., Hayat, T., Alsaedi, A. & Ahmad, B. Sustainability-based economic and ecological evaluation of a rural biogas-linked agro-ecosystem. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 41, 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.043 (2015).
Google Scholar
Lu, W. X., Wu, H. C. & Geng, S. S. Heterogeneity and threshold effects of environmental regulation on health expenditure: Considering the mediating role of environmental pollution. J. Environ. Manag. 297, 113276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113276 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, A. L., Hu, S. & Lin, B. Q. Can environmental regulation solve pollution problems? Theoretical model and empirical research based on the skill premium. Energy Econ. 94, 105068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105068 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lu, W. X., Wu, H. C., Yang, S. J. & Tu, Y. L. Effect of environmental regulation policy synergy on carbon emissions in China under consideration of the mediating role of industrial structure. J. Environ. Manag. 322, 116053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116053 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhang, D. Y., Zhao, R. & Ji, Q. Green innovation and firm performance: Evidence from listed companies in China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 144, 48–55 (2019).
Google Scholar
Romer, P. Endogenous technological change. J. Political Econ. 5, 71–102 (1990).
Google Scholar
Ahmed, E. M. Modelling green productivity spillover effects on sustainability. World J. Sci. Technol. Sustain. Dev. 17(3), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJSTSD-01-2020-0009 (2020).
Google Scholar
Abid, N., Ahmad, F., Aftab, J. & Razzaq, A. A blessing or a burden? Assessing the impact of Climate Change Mitigation efforts in Europe using Quantile Regression Models. Energy Policy 178, 113589 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. B. & Stavins, R. N. Dynamic incentives of environmental regulations: The effects of alternative policy instruments on technology diffusion. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 3, 43–64 (1995).
Google Scholar
Hamamoto, M. Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japenese manufacturing industries. Resour. Eng. Econ. 4, 299–312 (2006).
Google Scholar
Zhao, X. & Sun, B. The influence of Chinese environmental regulation on corporation innovation and competitiveness. J. Clean. Prod. 20, 1528–1536 (2016).
Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. B. & Palmer, K. Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. Review Econ. Stat. 4, 610–619 (1997).
Google Scholar
Fernando, Y., Jabbour, C. J. C. & Wah, W. X. Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: Does service capability matter?. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 141, 8–20 (2019).
Google Scholar
Christiansen, G. B. & Haveman, R. H. The contribution of environmental regulations to slowdown in productivity growth. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 4, 381–390 (1981).
Google Scholar
Xie, R., Yuan, Y. & Huang, J. Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on “green” productivity: Evidence from China. Ecol. Econ. 2, 104–112 (2017).
Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. B., Peterson, S. R., Portney, P. R. & Stavins, P. N. Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us. J. Econ. Lit. 4, 853–873 (1994).
Porter, M. E. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strateg. Manag. J. 12(S2), 95–117 (1991).
Google Scholar
Boyd, G. A., Tolley, G. & Pang, J. Plant level productivity, efficiency, and environmental performance of the container glass industry. Environ. Resour. Econ. 23(1), 29–43 (2002).
Google Scholar
Leeuwen, G. & Mohnen, P. Revisiting the Porter Hypothesis: An empirical analysis of green innovation for the Netherlands. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 26(1–2), 63–77 (2017).
Google Scholar
Rens, G., Li, X. L. & Yuan, B. L. The effect of three types of environmental regulation on eco-efficiency: A crossregion analysis in China. J. Clean. Prod. 1, 245–255 (2018).
Heuser, C., Mattoo, A. Services Trade and Global Value Chains in Policy Research Working Paper (World Bank) No. 8126 (Washington, DC, 2017).
Li, R. & Ramanathan, R. Exploring the relationships between different types of environmental regulations and environmental performance: evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 196, 1329–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.132 (2018).
Google Scholar
Guo, L. L., Qu, Y., Wu, C. Y. & Wang, X. L. Identifying a pathway towards green growth of Chinese industrial regions based on a system dynamics approach. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 128, 143–154 (2018).
Google Scholar
Van, L. G. & Mohnen, P. Revisiting the Porter hypothesis: An empirical analysis of green innovation for The Netherlands. Econ. Innovat. N. Technol. 26, 63–77 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ma, R., Abid, N., Yang, S. & Ahmad, F. From crisis to resilience: strengthening climate action in OECD countries through environmental policy and energy transition. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 17(3), 1–16 (2020).
Cui, S. N., Wang, Y. Q., Zhu, Z. W., Zhu, Z. H. & Yu, C. Y. The impact of heterogeneous environmental regulation on the energy eco-efficiency of China’s energy-mineral cities. J. Clean. Prod. 350, 131533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131553 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fang, Y. & Shao, Z. Whether green finance can effectively moderate the green technology innovation effect of heterogeneous environmental regulation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, 3646. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063646 (2022).
Google Scholar
Luo, Y. S., Salman, M. & Lu, Z. N. Heterogeneous impacts of environmental regulations and foreign direct investment on green innovation across different regions in China. Sci. Total Environ. 759, 143744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143744 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, L. P., Long, Y. & Li, C. Research on the impact mechanism of heterogeneous environmental regulation on enterprise green technology innovation. J. Environ. Manag. 322, 116127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113276 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yi, M., Fang, X. M., Wen, L., Guang, F. T. & Zhang, Y. The heterogeneous effects of different environmental policy instruments on green technology innovation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 4660. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234660 (2019).
Google Scholar
Song, Y., Yang, T. & Zhang, M. Research on the impact of environmental regulation on enterprise technology innovation—An empirical analysis based on Chinese provincial panel data. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, 21835–21848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05532-0 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, X., Chai, Y., Wu, W. & Khurshid, A. The empirical analysis of environmental regulation’s spatial spillover effects on green technology innovation in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 20, 1069 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bu, M. L., Qiao, Z. Z. & Liu, B. B. Voluntary environmental regulation and firm innovation in China. Econ. Modell. 89, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.12.020 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gray, W. B. & Shadbegian, R. J. Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 46, 384–402 (2003).
Google Scholar
Feng, M. & Chen, Y. Q. Impacts of heterogenous environmental regulations on green innovation of new energy firms: empirical evidence from China. J. Environ. Stud. 32, 5029–5046. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/169397 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wirth, C., Chi, J. & Young, M. The economic impact of capital expenditures: Environmental regulatory delay as a source of competitive advantage?. J. Bus. Financ. Account. 40, 115–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12009 (2013).
Google Scholar
Jeffrey, C. & Perkins, J. D. The Relationship between energy taxation and business environmental protection expenditures in the European Union. Int. J. Account. 49, 403–425 (2014).
Google Scholar
Wang, L. P. & Li, C. Experimental research on green technology innovation behavior based on voluntary contribution mechanism. J. Environ. Prot. Ecol. 23, 1345–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2014.10.002 (2022).
Google Scholar
Berman, E. & Bui, L. T. M. Environmental regulation and productivity: Evidence from oil refineries. Rev. Econ. Stat. 83(3), 10–18 (2001).
Google Scholar
Jia, K. & Chen, S. Could campaign-style enforcement improve environmental performance? Evidence from China’s central environmental protection inspection. J. Environ. Manag. 5, 282–290 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhu, X. H., Zuo, X. G. & Li, H. L. The dual effects of heterogeneous environmental regulation on the technological innovation of Chinese steel enterprises—Based on a high-dimensional fixed effects model. Ecolo. Econ. 188, 107113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107113 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sun, Z. Y., Wang, X. P., Liang, C., Cao, F. & Wang, L. The impact of heterogeneous environmental regulation on innovation of high-tech enterprises in China: Mediating and interaction effect. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 8323–8336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11225-w (2021).
Google Scholar
Tu, Z. G. & Shen, R. J. Can emissions trading scheme achieve the porter effect in China?. Econ. Res. 50, 160–173 (2015).
Zhong, S. H., Xiong, Y. J. & Xiang, G. C. Environmental regulation benefits for whom? Heterogeneous effects of the intensity of the environmental regulation on employment in China. J. Environ. Manag. 281, 111–877 (2021).
Google Scholar
Saunila, M., Ukko, J. & Rantala, T. Sustainability as a driver of green innovation investment and exploitation. J. Clean. Prod. 179, 631–641 (2018).
Google Scholar
Klewitz, J. & Hansen, E. G. Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 65, 57–75 (2014).
Google Scholar
Tone, K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 3, 498–509 (2001).
Google Scholar
Tone, K. & Tsutsui, M. An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA: A third pole of technical efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207, 1554–1563 (2010).
Google Scholar
Guo, R. & Yuan, Y. J. Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on energy efficiency in the industrial sector: Evidence from Chinese provincial data. Energy Policy 145, 111747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111747 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, C. & Zhang, Y. J. Does environmental regulation policy help improve green production performance? Evidence from China’s industry. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 27, 937–951 (2020).
Google Scholar
Li, H. L., Zhu, X. H., Chen, J. Y. & Jiang, F. T. Environmental regulations, environmental governance efficiency and the green transformation of China’s iron and steel enterprises. Ecol. Econ. 165, 106397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106397 (2019).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Li, Z. & Yin, X. The effects of three types of environmental regulation on energy consumption—Evidence from China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25, 27334 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhang, N., Deng, J., Ahmad, F., Draz, M. U. & Abid, N. The dynamic association between public environmental demands, government environmental governance, and green technology innovation in China: Evidence from panel VAR model. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 25(9), 9851–9875 (2023).
Google Scholar
Tang, K., Qiu, Y. & Zhou, D. Does command-and-control regulation promote green innovation performance? Evidence from China’s industrial enterprises. Sci. Total Environ. 712, 136362 (2020).
Google Scholar
You, D., Zhang, Y. & Yuan, B. Environmental regulation and firm eco-innovation: Evidence of moderating effects of social decentralization and political competition from listed Chinese industrial companies. J. Clean. Prod. 207, 1072 (2019).
Google Scholar
Liang, H., Shi, C., Abid, N. & Yu, Y. Are digitalization and human development discarding the resource curse in emerging economies?. Res. Policy. 85, 103844 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hansen, B. E. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing and inference. J. Econo. 2, 345–368 (1999).
Google Scholar
[ad_2]
Source link
