[ad_1]
WASHINGTON (AP) – Chief Justice John Roberts on Sunday highlighted the promise and shortcomings of artificial intelligence in federal courts in his annual report, but he also weighed in on the ethics of the Supreme Court and Donald Trump’s involvement. There is no mention of any legal disputes.
Roberts described artificial intelligence as the “newest technological frontier” and discussed the pros and cons of computer-generated content in the legal profession. His remarks came just days after the latest instance in which fake AI-generated legal citations appeared in official documents. Court records in a lawsuit involving former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen.
“It’s always a bad idea,” Roberts wrote in his year-end report, noting that “any use of AI requires caution and humility.”
But at the same time, the chief justice acknowledged that AI could make it much easier for people with less money to access the courts. “These tools have the welcome potential to eliminate the disparity between available resources and urgent needs in our court system,” Roberts wrote.
The report was released at the end of a year in which a series of articles questioned the ethical practices of judges and the court responded to criticism by adopting its first code of conduct. Many of those articles focused on Justice Clarence Thomas’ failure to disclose travel and other entertainment, as well as additional financial relationships with wealthy conservative donors such as Harlan Crowe and the Koch brothers. Ta. But Justices Samuel Alito and Sonia Sotomayor have also come under intense scrutiny.
The country is also at the start of an election year that is likely to involve the courts in some way in the ongoing criminal case against Trump and efforts to keep the former Republican president from voting in 2024.
Mr. Roberts, along with his eight colleagues, rarely discusses cases pending before the Supreme Court or cases that appear likely to reach the Supreme Court. In past reports, he has advocated for increased security and pay increases for federal judges, praised judges and their aides for their response to the coronavirus pandemic, and discussed other aspects of technological changes in courtrooms. has been emphasized.
Roberts once famously compared judges to umpires who call balls and strikes but don’t dictate the rules. In his latest report, he turned to another sport, tennis, and argued that technology will not replace referees anytime soon.
In many tennis tournaments, optical technology, rather than human linesmen, currently decides whether a 130 mph serve is in or out. “In contrast, legal decisions often involve gray areas that still require the application of human judgment,” Roberts wrote. There is.
Looking cautiously at the growing use of artificial intelligence in the courtroom, Roberts writes: However, I predict with equal confidence that judicial operations, particularly at the trial level, will be significantly impacted by AI. ”
[ad_2]
Source link
