[ad_1]
Editor’s note: We discussed pricing here. $650,000 is a joke, but I’m not trying to say that someone is stealing money. Maybe #biglaw is just being #biglaw….
So I waited patiently.
I’m a good guy.
Give people a chance to reach out.
A chance to make up.
Opportunity for collaboration.
A few weeks have passed. But… no. Just a cricket.
So…let’s get started.
As everyone knows, arrival is an industry association made up of passionate lead generators and buyers who want the industry to clean up its operations.
continue, Destruction of PACEnow REACH. de facto For trade and lead generation industries.
RIP
And we all know that REACH is working very closely with the FCC to bring a positive outcome to the current lead generator rules to promote good actors in the industry and the small businesses that depend on it. I am.
REACH works together. Transparent. Honestly.
It asks for input. We are conducting a listening tour. It educates, informs and inspires.
Its members represent the best the lead generation industry has to offer.
But there’s another powerful actor out there. A group that just thinks things can continue as they have been.thinking group They are I know best.
A group that makes fun of regulations and makes fun of people who follow the rules. A group that hides the truth. A group whose members say things like “fear mongers” when the Emperor takes to the stage to inform and enlighten.
A group that lives in the shadows. They want the industry to be free to harass, defraud, and defraud consumers with dirty tricks and dark patterns, just as it did before the FCC ruling.
They don’t try to work with the great actors in this field because they don’t intend to change their ways.The same group that was unable to complete an SRO despite spending tens of thousands of dollars and wasting money. Year on the project. They hate change because they only benefit from the status quo…
This group, now aligned with something called the Insurance Marketing Coalition, challenges the FCC’s recent lead generation decisions without consulting REACH, myself, or any of the good actors in the field. Decided to file an anemia petition.
this group Really In my opinion, this represents the worst nature of the industry. And they have no interest in collaborating, speaking with one voice, or serving any interests other than their own limited, myopic view of what the industry should be. is not interested.
terrible. Just terrible.
When PACE recently collapsed under the weight of this group’s influence, you would have thought they would wise up and bounce back. Change their ways. Seek the light.
But quite the contrary, they further strengthen their dark patterns (double intentions!) and retreat into dark corners to make even worse selfish decisions that end up harming everyone. I came back quickly.
But don’t worry, we won’t let them hide this time. It won’t last long.
For now, they remain nameless, but they still hope to repair the fence here. However, we will soon start publishing those parts together. It is fun. always…
What we know so far.
On December 21, 2023, IMC filed what I believe to be a woefully incomplete petition challenging the FCC’s 1-1 ruling. IMC appears to have filed its petition hastily for no other reason than a desperate attempt to position itself (somehow) as the lead petitioner in any subsequent challenge.
That’s stupid.
if REACH has chosen to appeal this judgment, but this decision has not yet been made. There is no doubt that your minimum funds, REACH, will drive your appeal.
Still, the people behind the IMC challenge clearly have a powerful weapon in their arsenal, and in my opinion, they’re putting a block of $65,000 into small businesses to fund the “first phase” of the challenge. We are raising $1,000,000.
pause.
This is very similar to PACE. People who spend tens of thousands of dollars hoping for results that never show up.
Now, the people who were “asked” to provide this funding were told that the companies chosen to petition were highly experienced in such matters and had been successful in overturning FCC rulings in the past. Ta.
Lawyers are like this.
Yaron Street
kevin king
records advisor
Matthew J. Glover
John A. Voglin
Sameer Agarwal
Covington & Burling LLP
850 10th Avenue NW
Washington DC 20001
(202) 662-5488
kking@cov.com
Hmm…I don’t know of any FCC rulings that they overturned. Maybe someone can educate me. Maybe I missed it.
But even if we were successful in defeating the FCC in the past (and I would appreciate it if someone could send it to me), past success means future results are guaranteed. It is very disturbing to suggest that there is. I mean…there should be a pretty serious disclaimer there, right? was there?
I don’t understand.
That being said, let’s take a look at this petition together. You can read it here: Petition (IMC vs. FCC)
It says:
IMC is currently submitting this application for review out of an abundance of caution and will file a second application for review upon publication of this order in the Federal Register.
Sufficient vigilance?
With enough caution?
I mean, these super-powerful lawyers who have managed to beat the FCC head on – so I’ve heard others say that too –I don’t even know when their petition is due????
*insert thumbs up emoji here*
Understood.
Everything you wanted to know.
Anyway, I won’t be rough with anyone yet. Just warming up. I’ll hold back for now and hope that my phone rings and people decide to work together instead of always acting unilaterally. One voice and that’s all.
I hope I don’t have to prepare another gravestone…
On the other hand, look at how nice and thoughtful REACH is.
Very classy group there.
Chat now.
[ad_2]
Source link
