[ad_1]
As the 2024 World Economic Forum concludes and everyone heads home, they want to introduce initiatives that build on what was so important to them that they made the annual pilgrimage to Davos in the first place.
Given all the amazing capabilities and, as you can already see, the limitless power of AI, there are big questions and no doubt even bigger questions are being asked. The question is: Can the world regulate AI while limiting its potential? Or, conversely, can we advance AI technology without abandoning our cooperative attitude in the face of unethical advances by bad actors (of which we know there is no shortage)?
The World Economic Forum answers yes to both questions. At the same time, skeptics are making unconvincing counter-arguments such as “Oh yeah,” and insisting that there is no way to stop them from advancing their own interests and seeking bragging rights over shiny new technologies. A never-ending quest for supremacy.
So what is given?
Is this an unsolvable puzzle? An immovable object vs. an irresistible force? The inevitable beginning of a new chaos? Are we in an MC Escher painting, with stairs leading to nowhere and water flowing uphill?
governance
The World Economic Forum says on its website’s public relations page:
- The World Economic Forum’s AI Governance Alliance says a global effort is needed to create equitable access to artificial intelligence.
- Artificial intelligence has the potential to address global challenges, but it also risks widening existing digital divides or creating new ones.
The Forum’s AI Governance Alliance (AIGA) has released three reports highlighting generative AI governance, highlighting its value and a framework for responsible AI development and deployment.
“This partnership brings together governments, businesses, and experts to shape responsible AI development applications and governance, and to ensure fair distribution and enhanced access to path-breaking technologies around the world,” the forum said. We will ensure it.”
And all around me, I keep hearing the responses of skeptics saying, “Yeah, right.”
here is the question
Is there a roadmap for this kind of thing? Is there precedent? model? Or, at least, can we imagine an entirely new approach? Furthermore, are you sure?
Setting aside the question of our willingness for a moment, the answer to all other questions is a resounding “yes.”
United Nations Trusteeship Council
[OneofthesixorgansoftheUnitedNationsestablishedattheSanFranciscoConferencein1945theCouncil’smissionwastodevelopItwastooverseethedecolonizationofdependentterritorieswhichwasnosmallmatterAtthattimeSkepticismwashigh[1945年のサンフランシスコ会議で設立された国連の6つの機関の1つであるこの評議会の使命は、世界の陸地面積の3分の1が植民地支配下にあったことから、世界中の属領の脱植民地化を監督することであり、これは決して小さな問題ではありませんでした。その時。懐疑論は高かった。
But on November 1, 1994, the United Nations Trusteeship Council ceased its own operations, leaving fewer people living under colonial rule around the world than living in the borough of Manhattan. Less than 50 years later, the council closed up shop, and the last man to leave the room turned off the lights and hung a “Mission Accomplished” sign on the door. The Council is virtually willing to go out of business, even though the UN Charter requires it to continue on paper. (Source: un.org)
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
The IAEA is an intergovernmental organization established in 1957 in response to growing international concerns about nuclear weapons, especially in light of rising U.S.-Soviet tensions, and in response to President Dwight Eisenhower’s “Atoms for Peace” speech. It was established as a result.
Two-thirds of a century later, we all know that nine countries have highly developed nuclear weapons capabilities, but one fact remains irrefutable. No nuclear weapons have been deployed since the United States ended World War II with two atomic bombs. At the same time, 401 nuclear reactors (with another 57 under construction) are currently operating in 32 countries, producing about 10% of the world’s electricity. (Source: IAEA)
Using carrots (agreements, alliances, joint ventures) and sticks (inspections and sanctions), the IAEA has accomplished a formidable and undeniable job.
The United Nations Trusteeship Council and the IAEA are two proofs that we know what it takes to regulate and advance AI at the same time.
Well, the question remains. “Are you willing to do it?”
This important year ahead will prove that.
follow me twitter Or LinkedIn. check out my website.
[ad_2]
Source link
